Unit 4 Quiz — How Is Metaphysics Possible? (§§40

What, for Kant, distinguishes pure REASON from the UNDERSTANDING, and thereby launches the whole inquiry of Part III?

The three transcendental ideas — soul, world-whole, God — correspond exactly to the three departments of traditional 'special metaphysics'. Which mapping is correct?

An 'antinomy' of pure reason is best described as…

Kant resolves the antinomies differently depending on their type. Which statement is correct?

Kant calls rational psychology's inference from the 'I think' to an immortal soul a PARALOGISM. What is the fallacy?

What is Kant's single, shared objection to the ontological, cosmological, and physico-theological proofs of God's existence?

Kant sharply distinguishes a 'limit' (Schranke) from a 'boundary' (Grenze). How do reason's ideas relate to possible experience?

In what sense does Kant finally conclude that metaphysics IS possible 'as a science'?

✍️ Open answer · AI-graded

Kant claims the antinomy of pure reason is not a disaster for reason but 'the key' that establishes transcendental idealism. Reconstruct this argument: what is an antinomy, what hidden assumption produces it, how does its removal resolve the conflict, and why does Kant treat the whole episode as a proof that we know only appearances? Distinguish carefully the mathematical from the dynamical antinomies in your answer.

What to cover: Explain what an antinomy is and give the four (at least the first and third), identify the shared false premise, show how dropping it resolves each type differently, and state clearly why this amounts to an indirect proof of transcendental idealism rather than a refutation of reason.

Unit 4 Quiz — How Is Metaphysics Possible? (§§40–60)

Results